<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gandhi on Piccadilly and building a brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chlog.chlorophyll.in/?feed=rss2&#038;p=168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chlog.chlorophyll.in/?p=168</link>
	<description>The definitive branding blog from chlorophyll brand and communication consultants</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ketan</title>
		<link>http://chlog.chlorophyll.in/?p=168#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ketan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chlog.chlorophyll.in/?p=168#comment-610</guid>
		<description>"After all, a brand, at its simplest and deepest level, is a single big idea, an idea that doesn’t change with circumstance"

I disagree. After all what is a Brand's worth if not everyone can identify with it? a brand has to be in a constant state of flux to adapt to each and everyone. Case in point - Vodafone. This brand has a consistently new approach to capture 'mindspace' for each segment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After all, a brand, at its simplest and deepest level, is a single big idea, an idea that doesn’t change with circumstance&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree. After all what is a Brand&#8217;s worth if not everyone can identify with it? a brand has to be in a constant state of flux to adapt to each and everyone. Case in point - Vodafone. This brand has a consistently new approach to capture &#8216;mindspace&#8217; for each segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
